Drug Possession
If you or
a loved one has been charged with a drug crime, you need to understand that the
potential consequences can be quite severe.
A conviction for a drug charge can result in prison time, lengthy
probationary periods, high fines, and suspension of your driving privileges. An experienced criminal defense attorney may
be able to help you avoid these dire consequences.
Whether
you have been charged with possession, possession with intent to sell, or drug trafficking, an experienced drug crimes lawyer will explore some of the
following defenses to fight your case:
Illegal Search and Seizure
The Fourth
Amendment to the United States Constitution is a safeguard of justice and protects
people against unreasonable searches and seizures of either self or property by government officials. In this
scenario, a skilled drug crimes lawyer will evaluate your case to determine
whether law enforcement had probable cause to stop your vehicle or to search
your car or your person.
Constructive Possession
To
establish constructive possession, the state must show that the accused had
dominion and control over the contraband, knew the contraband was within his
presence, and knew of the illicit nature of the contraband. Brown v. State, 428 So.2d 250 (Fla.
1983).
Insufficient Evidence
When
charged with a felony drug offense, the State is charged with the burden of
proving that the recovered substance is in fact the illicit drug that law
enforcement claims it is. This means
that the State will be required to send the substance to the Florida Department
of Law Enforcement (FDLE) to have the substance tested and weighed. In a number of cases, the substance either doesn’t
test positive for what it is alleged to be, doesn’t meet the weight requirement
for a trafficking offense, or simply doesn’t get tested at all. In any of these scenarios, and experienced
drug crimes lawyer will move to have your charges dismissed.
Entrapment
In
the State of Florida, there are two types of entrapment defenses: subjective
and objective.
To
establish a subjective entrapment defense, a drug crimes lawyer would need to
establish that law enforcement induced their client to commit an offense that
they were not otherwise predisposed to commit.
Pursuant to Florida Statute §777.201, the accused must establish the
following elements by the greater weight of the evidence:
Objective
Entrapment
Objective
entrapment is applied in cases involving egregious law enforcement conduct and
is evaluated under the due process provision of the Florida Constitution. The
defense of objective entrapment requires reviewing the totality of the
circumstances in order to ascertain whether police conduct offends canons of
decency and fairness.
Drug Court
Most
jurisdictions offer drug court programs aimed at rehabilitation of the
offender. These programs typically range
from 7 – 18 months. In order to be
deemed eligible to participate in a drug court program, the offender must meet the
following criteria: (1) must have a serious drug/alcohol problem; (2) be a
non-violent offender; (3) not previously terminated from a drug court program;
and (4) be charged with a felony drug related charge (possession, purchase, or
obtaining prescriptions by fraud).
Pre-Trial Diversion
This
program is offered for first-time offenders who charged with possession of
small amount of drugs. The pre-trial
diversion program requires the offender to complete drug treatment, undergo
random drug screens, complete community service hours, and pay a fine. Successful completion of a pre-trial
diversion program will result in the criminal charges being dismissed.
Free Case Evaluation
Subjective
Entrapment
- the accused was induced or encouraged by law enforcement or a law enforcement agent (such as a confidential informant) to engage in criminal conduct in order for law enforcement to obtain evidence of the commission of a crime;
- the accused engaged in such criminal conduct as a direct result of law enforcement inducement or encouragement;
- the person who induced or encouraged the accused was a law enforcement officer or a person engaged in cooperating with or acting as an agent of a law enforcement officer;
- the person who induced or encouraged the accused employed methods of persuasion or inducement so as to create a substantial risk that the crime would be committed by a person other than the one who was ready to commit it; and
- the accused was not a person ready to commit the crime.
Once
the Court finds that the defense has met their burden, the burden shifts to the
State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was predisposed to
commit the alleged crime and that the accused’s predisposition to commit the
crime existed prior to and independent of the inducement or encouragement by
law enforcement.
In cases
where these defenses are not available, other options that can be explored
include drug court and pre-trial diversion.
If you or
a loved one has been charged with a drug offense, it is important to seek the
advice of a competent and skilled criminal defense lawyer. We will be able to evaluate your case and
look for defenses that may not be obvious to you. Call today at 407-473-1233 to schedule your
free and confidential case review.
Comments
Post a Comment