Posts

I Have Been Arrested for DUI, Now What?

Unlike most criminal cases, DUI cases seem to affect the broadest demographic of clients.   According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2014, over 1.1 million Americans were arrested for DUI.   If you have been arrested for DUI, there are some things that you need to know. In the State of Florida, an arrest for a DUI will not only result in a criminal charge, it will also result in an Administrative Suspension of your driving privileges through the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV) if you refused to provide and blood, breath, or urine sample, or if you provided a breath test in excess of the legal limit. As frightening as the prospect of having to appear before a Judge to answer to the DUI charge might be, your first concern should be in regards to your driving privileges.   You only have 10-days from the date of your arrest to either apply for a hardship license or to file an Application for a Formal Review Hearing.  

That's Not Meth

On December 11, 2015, an Orlando man was arrested for a felony charge of Possession of Methamphetamine .   The resulted from a traffic stop as the Orlando man was exiting an Orlando area 7-11.   Orlando police officers claimed that they had stopped the man’s vehicle for failing to come to complete stop as he was exiting the convenience store parking lot. According to the arrest affidavit, Orlando Police Officer Shelby Riggs-Hopkins wrote that she “observed in plain view a rock like substance on the floor board where his feet were.”   When questioned about what was found, the man advised that what she was looking at was sugar from a Krispy Kreme donut.   This eleven-year veteran of the Orlando Police Department retrieved the observed substance and conducted a field test.   The substance produced a positive result for amphetamines.   When questioned further about the substance, the 64-year old man advised Officer Riggs-Hopkins that the substance was sugar. Rather than conduc

Traffic Ticket Quotas

The Winter Springs Police Department is currently being investigated for a program where Officers were rewarded for meeting and/or exceeding citations issued and arrests made during a week in September.  During the weekend of September 10th, more than 100 citations, warnings, and arrests were made.  A discovered internal handwritten memo titled, "Delta Shift Weekend Competition" offered points to the officers for cases ranging from a traffic ticket to a DUI arrest.  The winner of the contest would be able to "float" for a pay period and would get a surprise. On July 1, 2015, Florida Governor Rick Scott signed a law that forbids local governments from having traffic ticket quote programs.  Many believe that this law ensures transparency in government and prevents the exploitation of motorists.  This investigation into the Winter Springs Police Department being conducted by WFTV News 9 could create issues for the agency. If you were issued a civil traffic infracti

Changes to Florida Minimum Mandatory 10-20-LIFE Law

Florida Senate Bill 228 was drafted as an act relating to mandatory minimum sentences.  On October 1, 2016, it was enacted into law by amending Florida Statute 775.087.  The amendment deleted aggravated assault from the list of convictions which carry a minimum term of imprisonment if during the commission of the offense the convicted person possessed a firearm or destructive device.  It also deleted the term aggravated assault from the list of convicts which carry a minimum term of imprisonment if during the commission of the offense the convicted person possessed a semiautomatic firearm.

Changes to Florida Firearms Law

The Florida Legislature has enacted an act making it a crime to threaten terror or acts of violence towards public officials.  Senate Bill 436 was signed into law and created Florida Statute 836.12.  This statute defines the terms "family member" and "law enforcement officer."  Senate Bill 436 also amends Florida Statutes 790.163 and 790.164 by creating the crime of falsely reporting the use of firearms in a violent manner against a person or persons.

Criminal Defense - Escape

Claudio J. Poillot was serving a 48-month prison sentence for a felony conviction.   While in state custody and being housed at the Kissimmee Community Center, Poillot began employment with a construction company, JS & Son Construction Services through the work release program.   The work release program permitted Poillot to work outside of the correctional facility from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday.   On July 29, 2014, he left the Kissimmee Community Work Release Center and timely reported to work at JS & Son Construction.   Shortly thereafter, Poillot left his place of employment without permission and was unaccounted for until he timely returned to the work release center before 6:00 p.m.   Upon his return, Poillot was arrested and charged with escape pursuant to Florida Statute §944.40.   Subsequently, the trial court granted Poillot’s Motion to Dismiss and the State appealed. The Fifth District Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s decision,

DUI Video Saves the Day

A Florida DUI case was reversed following the Second District Court of Appeals conclusion that the circuit court had applied the wrong standard of review. A Sarasota man was arrested and charged with DUI .   Law enforcement made the arrest for DUI based on their assessment of the man’s level of intoxication during the traffic stop.   The officer testified that the defendant smelled of alcohol, was slurring his words, and had bloodshot and glassy eyes.   The defendant admitted to have been drinking, but advised that he had only one beer and one shot. A Motion to Suppress was filed on the basis that law enforcement did not have probable cause to make the arrest for DUI .   The key piece of evidence was a dash camera that recorded the encounter.   The county court judge agreed that the video contained no indication that the defendant had slurred speech or was impaired and granted the motion.   The State appealed to the circuit court which reversed the lower court’s order

DUI Laws to change following US Supreme Court case

DUI laws in the State of Florida and across the country were shaken upon following the United State’s Supreme Court’s ruling in Birchfield v. North Dakota .   The issue that was presented was whether in the absence of a warrant, may a state statute criminalize an individual’s refusal to submit to a blood alcohol test. In the State of Florida, refusal to submit to a breath, urine or blood test can be considered a criminal misdemeanor according to Florida Statute §316.1939.   Pursuant to section 316.1939: Any person who has refused to submit to a chemical or physical test of his or her breath, blood, or urine, as described in s. 316.1932 , and whose driving privilege was previously suspended for a prior refusal to submit to a lawful test of his or her breath, urine, or blood, and: (a) Who the arresting law enforcement officer had probable cause to believe was driving or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in this state while under the influence of alcoholic beverages

Violation of Probation

          On April 21, 2016, the Florida Supreme Court granted review of the Second District Court of Appeals decision in Queior v. State , 157 So.3d 370 (Fla. 2DCA 2015) on the issue of whether a Probation Officer’s testimony that a probationer has failed a drug test administered by the Probation Officer is competent, non-hearsay evidence for purposes of proving a violation of probation .                In Queior , the State sought to revoke the defendant’s probation of the basis of a positive drug test.   At the hearing on the violation of probation , the State offered testimony from the defendant’s probation officer that they personally administered the drug test and that the test read positive.   The defense objected to the testimony claiming that the State had failed to lay the proper predicate to establish the reliability of the field drug test.   The trial court revoked the defendant’s probation.           The defendant appealed, and the Second District Court of Appeal r

Criminal Sentencing

          On April 28, 2016, the Florida Supreme Court granted review of the Fourth District Court of Appeals decision in Norvil v. State , 162 So.3d 3 (Fla. 4DCA 2014) on the issue of whether a trial court can consider a subsequent arrest without conviction during sentencing for the primary offense.                 In Norvil , the defendant was charged with one count of armed burglary of a dwelling .   The defendant entered an open plea to the bench, and during sentencing, the State filed a Sentencing Memorandum requesting that the court consider a subsequent charge of burglary of a vehicle that was still pending.   Over the defense’s objection, the trial court announced that it was going to consider the pending charge and declined to sentence defendant to a Youthful Offender sentence and instead sentenced him to twelve-years in prison.           On appeal, the issue before the Court was whether the trial court violated the defendant’s due process rights by considering a subseq

Florida Death Penalty Unconstitutional

This morning, the United States Supreme Court, in an 8 - 1 decision, has ruled that Florida's system for sentencing persons to death is unconstitutional.  The system is set up to where the same jury who found the accused guilty, will participate in the "penalty phase" of the trial.  During the penalty phase, both the State and Defense will put on testimony and offer evidence in an effort to sway a jury into deciding to rule in favor of death or life in prison.  The problem the Court found was that regardless of the jury's decision, the ultimate decision power rested in the hands of the trial Judge.